Ditched linear features to the northeast of Petersham Farm are visible on 1940s aerial photographs. The features are presumed to be historic field boundaries of probable post medieval date, although an earlier origin is possible. They were digitally plotted by the Dorset Stour NMP project.
Loading documents & images
Map
Find a placename, postcode or grid reference
Map layers
Base layers
Info
Record list
Tools
The map is limited to 3000 records per layer so not all records are being displayed for this area. Zoom in to see more.
Ditched linear features to the northeast of Petersham Farm are visible on 1940s aerial photographs (1).
The features are predominantly narrow and rectilinear in form. The pattern of historic enclosure within which these features sit includes field boundaries that are irregular and curvilinear in form, suggesting a probable medieval origin, but with some straighter rectilinear boundaries sub-dividing these, indicating some post medieval re-organisation (2). The rectilinear character of the features suggests these are historic field boundaries of probable post medieval date, although an earlier origin is possible.
The site is still fields on current Google Earth imagery, but with significant historic boundary removal. The features are no longer visible. They were digitally plotted by the Dorset Stour NMP project.
Sources/Archives (2)
<1> SDO15984
Aerial Photograph: Royal Air Force. 17-JAN-47. RAF/CPE/UK/1934 RS 4185-6.
Do you have any questions or more information about this record? Please feel free to comment below with your name and email address. All comments are submitted to the website maintainers for moderation, and we aim to respond/publish as soon as possible. Comments, questions and answers that may be helpful to other users will be retained and displayed along with the name you supply. The email address you supply will never be displayed or shared.
Comments
Insert Link
Report Comment
Max 1000 characters. Plain text only.
Email User
Your message will be emailed to the person who posted this comment.